Monday, September 8, 2014

Uber drivers say company’s promise of big pay day doesn’t match reality

When UBER flat out lies and says that drivers are making $90,000 + a year they are not making this statement as the average driver annual income.  The statement may be true of less than 1% of its drivers but the fact to the matter is that the average driver probably makes less than $24,000 per year not including expenses:  (Cost of newer automobile, mileage, wear and tear on the drivers car, gasoline, insurance, maintenance and the imposed fees UBER takes out of each weeks pay). Now the figure is probably more like $15,600 a year which translates to roughly $7.50 per hour not including taxes or benefits that the drivers need to purchase for themselves because UBER does not provide anything for its driver/ Partners.  You know why they get away with this abuse?  Because they have a revolving door of new drivers seeking the false advertisement of big pay.  If you don't believe me just ask any UBER driver and if they are honest they will tell you the truth.  Just don't ask the new drivers they are still trying to figure the facts out, by the time they receive their first two or three paycheck most of them find the door on their own. I believe this is criminal and we should all be talking with Shannon Liss-Riordan, a Boston-based attorney who has filed a suit against UBER for unfair labor practices. I've said it before and I'll say it again... UBER needs to be regulated!

Story Published by the Washington Post
www.washingtonpost.com
Luz Lazo September 6, 2014

Some Uber drivers say company’s promise of big pay day doesn’t match reality



September 6


The lure of taking home 80 percent of the fares he collected as a driver for Uber was a sweet incentive for Demek Dagnachew to sign up with the ride-sharing service in April.
But soon after he started ferrying passengers around the District in his 2012 Toyota Camry, he said he noticed his earnings didn’t quite reflect the 80/20 split he’d been promised. Deductions began to appear in his paycheck, including a weekly $10 charge for using the app-ready smartphone he received when he started the new job.
“I thought 80 percent of the fares was a very good deal, but in reality Uber was making more money than I was,” said Dagnachew, 49, who quit the job last month. “I had to pay taxes, gas, mileage and for car maintenance and repairs. I was spending time and making $3 per hour.”
As the company based in San Francisco has grown exponentially, Uber has brought tens of thousands of drivers on board, touting the ride-share industry as a ­hard-to-pass-up opportunity where drivers can make up to $90,000 a year driving for the popular service.
But increasingly, drivers, labor leaders and attorneys representing drivers say the company’s claims of high pay are a sham. Across the country, Uber drivers have complained about unfair treatment and payment policies. Some say the low fares the company implements to remain competitive and attract customers have cut into their earnings.
In addition, because Uber drivers are considered independent contractors, they are not entitled to benefits; their relationship with Uber is merely about their use of the company’s app that connects them to riders. As contractors, they have the flexibility to work when they want and as many hours as they choose, but they also have to cover any costs they incur. After adding up those costs, some drivers say, making a profit is nearly impossible.
Uber spokesman Taylor Bennett said drivers do get 80 percent of the fares they earn; the company takes 20 percent to cover costs for marketing, drivers’ background checks, insurance and other administrative costs. The $10 weekly phone charge, he said, was rolled out over the past year in cities across the country, but he said he is unaware of any other fees imposed on drivers.
The company says it is creating 20,000 new driver jobs every month and it calls its “driver partners” small business entrepreneurs who earn better wages than taxi drivers. The average annual salary for a cabdriver in the United States is $22,820, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Uber declined to say how much its average Washington area uberX driver makes, but the company has said its drivers make as much as $90,000 a year in the New York market and $74,000 in San Francisco. UberX is the cheapest of the services it provides; the other is its premium luxury sedan service, uberBlack.
Bennett said that Uber drivers in the D.C. area who work “40 hours a week or more, are making a very good living . . . it is certainly better than taxis.”
Some drivers and labor advocates dispute those figures.
“I haven’t heard from any drivers who are making anything like that,” said Shannon Liss-Riordan, a Boston-based attorney who filed a lawsuit in June against Uber for unfair labor practices. “I don’t see how they think the drivers are going to make more than taxi drivers where they are charging less than taxis and they are having to pay all these expenses.”
Uber has expanded to more than 200 cities around the globe, revolutionizing the drive services industry, challenging antiquated taxicab systems and regulations while promising customers an easier, more efficient and cheaper transportation alternative. The company recently took its ­self-described war against “Big Taxi” to the next level by hiring former Obama adviser David Plouffe as its senior vice president for policy and strategy. Its popularity and quick growth has drawn protests from the taxi industry and mobilized lawmakers nationwide to tackle the mostly unregulated industry. But most of the attention has focused on the service’s impact on the traditional taxi industry, leading many to believe that drivers for Uber and similar services are leading a charmed life.
In the District, Uber recently cut its prices 15 percent, saying that its service is now 30 percent cheaper than a D.C. taxi. An uberX fare from Dupont Circle to Union Station, for example, is about $9, so if three friends share a ride and split the fare, they’d be paying just slightly more than a rush-hour Metro fare. The same trip by taxi would cost roughly $20.
The low Uber fares, while good news for riders, are a major concern for drivers who say they cut into their profits.
Last week more than 50 uberX drivers in Los Angeles gathered in a parking lot protesting the continued cuts in their pay. A driver said he has been through four fare cuts, going from $2.50 a mile to $1.10 a mile, according to news reports. A week earlier, about 100 uberX drivers in Seattle quit in protest of a recent fare reduction there. The Seattle Ride-Share Drivers Association said that after expenses are accounted for, drivers are losing money each time they pick up fares. In May, about 100 uberX drivers rallied outside the company’s headquarters in San Francisco demanding better pay after Uber announced another massive fare discount to keep the company’s fares below those of taxis.
“They keep reducing the fares, and that is great for them to get more customers, but it is really hurting the drivers,” said Liss-Riordan.
The lawsuit she filed on behalf of an Uber driver claims that Uber misclassifies its drivers as independent contractors to avoid paying them the same as employees with benefits. It also accuses Uber of having an unfair gratuity system and robbing drivers of tips.
The company misleads customers into thinking that a tip is already calculated into the fare, Liss-Riordan said. Uber’s system promotes a flat rate fare, which does not give customers the option of tipping when booking a ride.
“It is customary in the car service industry that passengers would tip drivers, so Uber is misleading the passengers into thinking that tips are already included when they are not,” she said.
Dagnachew, who works as a security guard at The Washington Post, said drivers are warned not to accept cash tips or risk losing their jobs. Uber, however, said that if customers want to tip, the company doesn’t have a policy prohibiting drivers from accepting them.
But part of what makes Uber hassle-free for riders is that customers can count on a ­one-transaction ride and don’t have to worry about taking their credit card out during the trip or carrying cash for tipping.
“We say you don’t have to tip, it is one flat fare,” Bennett, the company spokesman, said.
And some Uber drivers say that although their experience hasn’t been perfect, they appreciate the opportunity to earn good money.
Willie D. Smith, a Vietnam War Veteran with 15 years of experience in the limo industry, says he has worked for uberBlack for more than a year. In recent months, technical glitches with the company’s computer system resulted in him not getting paid several times, he said. But after several exchanges with the company, he said the problem was fixed. He said he is glad to continue making about $500 a week.
“It is a great company to work for,” Smith, 71, said. “You can make extra cash if your are willing to work hard.”
The challenge, Smith said, is that Uber takes its claim that it is a technology company and not a transportation company very seriously, so much so that nearly all transactions and communication, including drivers’ complaints are handled electronically, causing some frustration among drivers.
When Dagnachew disputed several payments, including one for work done on July 23, he received no answers. That day, his records show he made six trips, traveled 42 miles, spent four hours hauling passengers for a total of $79 in fares. His payment was $37.
In e-mail exchanges with Uber, Dagnachew, who lives in Springfield and works full time as a security guard in downtown Washington, complained about his share being cut by more than 50 percent.
“It is as if I was working for free,” he wrote in the e-mail, asking for an explanation. But the response to his queries came in what appears to be an automated e-mail, with information about how the payment cycle works and no answers specific to his case.
“I need to know why they took more money than me,” he said, frustrated. “I understand this service is good for the customer. The customer pays less and gets clean and reliable service. But the customer doesn't know what goes on inside.”
Uber says it has a good communication system to allow its “driver partners” to make claims. Bennett said the system gives people a chance to work, set their own schedules, drive when they want to drive, and be their own boss. Their drivers, he said, are full-time students working to earn their degrees, parents in need of extra cash, and people who take the job full time. Bennett said he could not respond to Dagnachew’s complaints because he did not know the specifics.
“It is a real opportunity and exciting chance for folks to make a living or make some income on the side,” he said. “We have thousands of drivers, tens of thousands across the globe. . .. We want to address any issues that may arise and we want to make sure that they are feeling comfortable and that the experience is not only great for riders but is great for drivers as well.”

Uber hires lobbyist after German ban

Uber hires lobbyist after German ban

Uber app Uber has been given a tough time across Europe by opponents

Related Stories

The car pick-up firm Uber has strengthened its lobbying team after its service was banned in Germany.
The firm confirmed it has hired Mark MacGann as head of public policy for Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
A Frankfurt court recently ruled that it was not operating its "low cost" UberPop service legally. Uber has also been the subject of protests across European cities, including London.
But Uber vowed to continue operating and fight the German ruling.
Mr MacGann, who has previously held senior jobs with the lobbying firms Weber Shandwick, Brunswick and FIPRA, would be tasked with pushing through Uber's planned European expansion, the company confirmed.
Battle According to his own LinkedIn profile, Mr MacGann has specialised in "challenging incumbents to gain market access for innovative and disruptive industrial ventures".
The firm has faced stiff opposition from cab drivers across the continent, who have complained that it competes unfairly.
The firm, which is backed by Google and Goldman Sachs, often offers a lower cost service than local cabs do but has been accused of sidestepping much of the regulation involved.
Uber protesters Barcelona cab drivers strike in protest at Uber in July this year
It says it simply connects drivers with passengers and calculates the fare based on GPS. But cab drivers say it is a meter by any other name, which they need to be licensed to use.
In June this year, protests took place in many European cities, including Berlin, Paris and London. And, in August, a French court demanded that Uber change how its driver invoice system worked, to meet local rules.
That was followed by actions in the German courts, the most recent battle taking place in Frankfurt.
There, the judge issued a summary judgment, placing a ban on Uber pending a full hearing. The firm could face up to a 250,000 euro ($327,840; £198,342) fine per trip if it ignores the restriction - as it has said it intends to do.
Expansion Uber has stated its desire for rapid expansion in Germany. Only days before the German ban was ordered, it said it expected to double its size in the country by the end of the year.
Despite protests in London, the British authorities have provided lesser opposition, deciding not to pursue a case against Uber in June.
Uber is not alone in employing lobbyists to present its interests on a multinational level. However, the appointment of a lobbyist of more than two decades' experience indicates how seriously it is taking the challenges it currently faces in Europe.
The firm said it would release a more substantial statement on the appointment later on Monday.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Uber taking cabbies for a ride and stealing from it's drivers

Weather you drive or use UBER you should know that your getting a good deal at the expense of drivers who get abused by UBER.  If it sounds too good to be true it probably is.  UBER is taking advantage of a soft economy and the need for people to supplement their income.  Even The City of Chicago announced today a living wage for it's employees and contractors. Companies like UBER come into the state of Illinois and steal fares from cab and limo drivers by the use of unfair pricing practices.  Uber is able to modify their pricing at will without regulation of any sort and even offer and take the independent contractor (Driver/ Partners) money from their pockets without advanced warning or regard to how it effects the drivers needs. Over the past couple of weeks UBER has spent quite a bit on advertisement and trying to position their image as a generous employer who compensates their drivers with twice the minimum wage.  As I stated in previous blogs this is far from the truth, the number UBER uses to make the claim doesn't take into account their imposed fees, commissions, car maintenance, insurance, gasoline, the cost of the vehicle and last but not least the drivers time.  

  

Uber taking cabbies for a ride

Uber is the German word for, 'Stick em up, cabbies'

Chicago Tribune Story

June 20, 2014|By Ron Grossman
  • Taxi drivers gather next to the Olympic Stadium in Berlin on June 11 to protest ride-sharing apps.
Taxi drivers gather next to the Olympic Stadium in Berlin on June 11 to protest ride-sharing apps. (Sean Gallup, Getty Images)
If you're confused by the battle between Uber and traditional cabbies, consider this: Machine Gun Kelly didn't legitimize bank robbing by using cutting-edge technology to persuade bank tellers to hand over the till.
Before Kelly's innovation, bank robbers brandished pistols. But George Kelly favored a Thompson submachine gun, which gave him a nickname and a measure of immortality in Hollywood gangster movies. Still, his 1930s string of heists in Minnesota, Iowa and Washington didn't invalidate the biblical commandment: "Thou shalt not steal."
Yet Uber has come out of nowhere to establish a global presence with a business model based on flouting the rules of the heavily regulated taxi industry. By way of explaining itself, Uber invokes the magic word, the veritable abracadabra of the 21st century, "app." Its website proclaims: "Uber is evolving the way the world moves. By seamlessly connecting riders to drivers through our apps, we make cities more accessible." Tap that app on your smart phone, and a driver and car will speedily be sent your way.
As one electronic marvel has followed another, we've become mesmerized by a seductive but false assumption: Because wonders once scarcely dreamed of now lie at our fingertips, it seems legit to do anything that can be programmed into a computer or built into a smartphone. That ethical fallacy underlay the wave of "file-sharing" of pop music that robbed performers of royalties and put retailers out of business. Some Internet vendors are fighting a rear-guard action against charging sales tax. Because their orders arrive on electron wings, vendors think they shouldn't have to collect the tax paid by customers in a bricks-and-mortar store.
For its part, Uber justifies playing fast and loose by claiming consumers will benefit from its competition with traditional cab companies, and some heavy bets have been wagered on its winning the race.
Uber recently announced that, having raised an additional $1.2 billion in funding, its total valuation had reached $18.2 billion, and shows no signs of having topped out. Huge as those numbers are, they are not the only remarkable thing about Uber's appeal to investors.
If you or I seek a loan to buy a car or a home, the lender wants to make sure it will get its money back — even if our plans don't work out. That's why it retains a legal hold on the title to the vehicle or house until the loan is repaid. If we go belly up, the lender can recoup its investment by selling the collateral. The same scenario holds if we go to a pawnshop for a few bucks to tide us over until payday. We have to leave something with the pawner. Those guitars and jewelry in the shop window were pledged as collateral for loans that didn't get repaid.
Now if, say, Yellow Cab or Flash Cab asked investors for the kind of money Uber has gotten, it's easy to imagine what the collateral might have been. Cab companies have fleets of vehicles and garages. But when customers use Uber's app, they are dispatched a car whose driver owns and maintains it. So what physical assets does Uber have, besides smartphones and computers? Try hocking a cellphone or laptop. Pointing to shelves loaded with them, a shop owner will likely ask if you have anything else of value to pawn.
A week ago, an estimated 30,000 European taxi drivers, protesting Uber's free pass from government regulations, snarled traffic from London to Berlin. In Chicago, taxi companies filed a federal lawsuit demanding that the city enforce its taxi regulations, instead of giving app-dispatched drivers a pass. In San Francisco this week, dozens of Uber drivers rallied at the company's headquarters, angered by Uber chief Travis Kalanick's statement that driverless cars are the wave of the future. Even now, the drivers said, they don't get a fair share of the fares.
So what makes Uber's funders think that it holds the winning cards?
Their confidence may be sustained, in part, by what Chicago's City Council recently did, making them hopeful that other cities will follow. Instead of holding Uber to the rules, it changed the rules to meet Uber's needs. By creating a new category of "transportation network provider," it overrode an ordinance providing that if you want to operate a vehicle as a cab, it has to be licensed as a cab. The council's action also made explicit a handicap that cabbies were already carrying. Taxi fares are established by the city, while Uber and other "network providers" set their own fees, and can even instantaneously adjust them up or down, according to market fluctuations.
Cabs have to display a medallion, a transferable city license that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, plus a renewal fee. "Transportation providers" need only put a sign on their car identifying their network, and off they go. If, as its financial backers believe, Uber pulls ahead in its much touted competition for riders, the value of those taxi medallions will inexorably decline toward zilch.
When some Third World dictator threatens to nationalize a foreign-owned business, American entrepreneurs decry "expropriation," and demand compensation. Shouldn't they be similarly offended by Chicago ordaining a race in which one competitor plays with other people's money, and the other stands to lose a substantial investment if it loses a competition that didn't exist when it bought those medallions?
Is that equitable? To me, it seems more like what the Almighty had in mind when he laid down the law against stealing.
Ron Grossman is a Tribune writer and former history professor.

A group of Los Angeles–area Uber drivers has teamed up with Teamsters Local 986.

This kind of boldness is what every UBER driver needs to do.  We need to be talking to each other, we need to get organized and we need to stand together.  I said it before and I'll say it again "without the drivers UBER just has an application".  

The teamsters really have to get a handle on the UBER situation because it's a matter of time before UBER and company enter the package delivery business and displace all of the UPS, Federal Express, DHL and Postal Carriers and drivers.  UBER will be testing this capability very soon! 

Technology


Uber Drivers Flirt With The Teamsters

Limousine Charter and Tour Magazine

Posted on September 2, 2014

DISAPPOINTED: Ermias Andebrehan is among the nearly 250 Uber drivers who say they need a union to improve working conditions at the company. Photo from thestranger.com.
DISAPPOINTED: Ermias Andebrehan is among the nearly 250 Uber drivers who say they need a union to improve working conditions at the company. Photo from thestranger.com.

A group of Los Angeles–area Uber drivers has teamed up with Teamsters Local 986. The affiliation doesn't mean the drivers are unionizing. At this point, they couldn't do so if they wanted to because they are not technically employees. But Joseph DeWolf Sandoval, a member of the California App-Based Drivers’ Association (CADA) leadership counsel, says that could change if future court challenges are successful.
LA Weekly article here
Related news: Uber Defends Driver Pay Slash
View comments or post a comment on this story. (3 Comments)

New National Limo Group Targets TNC Issues

Mrs. Berkman hit it right on the nail by stating that (TNC's) Transportation Networking Companies  are undercutting chauffeured transportation and taxicab services by avoiding or resisting regulations, fees that apply to all forms of ground transportation companies.  UBER Partner/ Drivers and other like company drivers are unknowingly exposing themselves personally to lawsuits and liabilities beyond the drivers knowledge of the law. UBER and like companies are profiting largely at the expense of the drivers and the risk of their passenger/ rideshare members.  This is a time bomb!  It is not if but when a tragedy/ accident occurs that the drivers, politicians and the public will take notice of the actual cost for those who drive while skating on the fine line of what is legal.  If you want to drive for a living go ahead and do your homework...            Go ahead and do it right!

Regulations


New National Limo Group Targets TNC Issues

Limousine Charter and Tour Magazine

Posted on September 3, 2014 

By - Also by this author - About the author


SECAUCUS, N.J. & LOS ANGELES — Three veteran industry CEOs with extensive operations are launching an ad-hoc non-profit group that funds and coordinates efforts to fight for regulatory fairness between limousine companies and TNCs.

Called Advocates For Fairness In Transportation (AFT), the group will complement TNC-related regulatory efforts being pursued by the National Limousine Association and various state and regional limousine trade groups. AFT was formed by David Seelinger, CEO of Secaucus, N.J.-based Empire CLS Worldwide Chauffeured Services; Cheryl Berkman, owner of Burbank, Calif.-based Music Express; and Jonna Sabroff, President of Integrated Transportation Services (ITS) in Los Angeles.

Seelinger, Berkman and Sabroff are deploying Advocates in response to the widening regulatory battle with Transportation Networking Companies (TNCs) such as Uber, which is being fought mostly on state and city levels. AFT contends the TNCs are undercutting chauffeured transportation and taxicab services by avoiding or resisting regulations, fees and insurance coverage that apply to all other forms of ground transportation.

“We called a lot of NLA board members and they were all very supportive and thankful we are doing this,” said Berkman, who serves as the group's President. “I just want to keep the industry updated on what’s going on and to know there are people fighting for us.”

In the group’s opening salvo, the CEOs hired an attorney who wrote an Aug. 28 letter to Los Angeles World Airports regarding the “ongoing consideration of issuing Non-Exclusive License Agreements to (TNCs) allowing private vehicles to be used for commercial transportation services to and from Los Angeles International Airport.”

The letter further summarizes: “In proposing to permit TNCs at LAX, LAWA staff has so far failed to consider that permitting thousands of personal vehicles to engage in commercial operations on the airport's rights of way will result in greater traffic congestion, increased vehicle emissions, and public health and safety impacts at what is already a heavily congested airport. Therefore, we ask that you conduct an environmental review as required by the California Environmental Quality Act, before any further consideration of the TNC License Agreement."

FULL TEXT OF AFT LAX LETTER HERE

The letter has been circulated to Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, four City Council members, the Board of Airport Commissioners, the City Attorney, and the President and executive director of the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates charter-party carriers in California.

For now, the group is being funded exclusively by its three founders, but Berkman said they will start seeking other donors and contributors. Unlike a conventional trade association, AFT will not have the dues, roles or structures of such groups, but instead function as a highly focused effort on TNCs for as long as needed. The group is still developing its website.

Related LCT article: Berkman Sets Bold Example

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

The protests in London follow similar demonstrations in Paris, Madrid, Rome, Milan and Berlin.

"Perhaps it's time for the Cab and Limousine Drivers in Illinois to follow in the same steps that the European Cab drivers have taken against UBER!"  The message has to delivered in prime time (Rush Hour) so that the City Council knows how serious the UBER problem is.


The protests in London follow similar demonstrations in Paris, Madrid, Rome, Milan and Berlin.
It is hurry up time for UBER as they realize that the clock is ticking and many governments are weighing in on the legality and the long term negative effects UBER will have on their towns.  Don't get me wrong the technology is long over-due in the taxi industry, but UBER needs to be better regulated.  Hopefully city councils everywhere will take their time and evaluate the real cost of UBER.  So far GREEDY UBER has been able to grease the machine in Chicago.  The City Council in Chicago voted for tougher regulations and UBER has been able to lobby the right politicians and slow down the hand that may or may not enforce stricter rules on UBER.  Call your alderman and ask them when is UBER going to have to abide by their rules?  What are the new rules to be imposed on UBER and what day will they begin enforcing these new rules?

London's anti-Uber taxi protest brings traffic to standstill

Aerial footage showed gridlock in some parts of the capital


Related Stories

Thousands of taxi drivers brought part of central London to a standstill in protest at rival service Uber - a mobile phone app.
Cabbies gathered at Trafalgar Square at 14:00 BST for the hour-long protest.
The drivers are angry about what they regard as a lack of regulation of the use of apps such as Uber.
The app works out the cost of journeys and cab drivers say it is the same as using a taxi meter, which only black cabs are legally entitled to use.
The Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) also said part of the demonstration was about highlighting the length of training - between four and seven years - that taxi drivers undergo before being licensed.
Cab strike Areas around Parliament Square and Trafalgar Square were gridlocked
During the protest, roads were gridlocked around Parliament Square, Whitehall and Trafalgar Square.
Steve McNamara, from the LTDA, said: "We did not set out to cause disruption to Londoners.
"It is nothing to do with technology, some of the taxis have been using apps for years. The difference is all taxis have to operate legally, they [Uber] should have to apply for the same rules as everyone else."
He added that two drivers had been arrested and 10,000 drivers had attended the protest.
Taxi strike Approach roads to Trafalgar Square were brought to a standstill
But Scotland Yard denied any arrests had been made and Transport for London estimated that about 4,000 drivers had taken part.
Despite the protest, Uber said it had seen the number of people downloading its app increase by 850% compared to last Wednesday.
The Metropolitan Police had imposed strict conditions on protesters, including limiting the protest to an hour, after they failed to meet officers to discuss their plans.
Ch Sup Pippa Mills said, "Those who took part in today's protest complied with the timings set by police.
Cab strike Black cabs were refused access to Trafalgar Square
"However, we would always encourage organisers to meet with us to discuss their plans in advance so that they can achieve their aims around protest and we can ensure that disruption to the broader community is minimised."
Steve Garelick of the GMB union said: "I can categorically refute the claim that police have contacted me about this protest."
BBC London 94.9's Anna O'Neill said Haymarket was brought to a standstill and at one point cabs were prevented from accessing Trafalgar Square.
Some motorists sat on the pavements as they waited for the protest to end.
Stewart Rose Stewart Rose said Uber was "the beginning of the end" for cabbies
David Batist, 28, said although he had received an email alert from TfL warning him about the potential disruption it had been worse that expected.
"I didn't expect this. I would've taken a different route, had I known. It's caused me quite a lot of disruption. I've had to cancel a meeting."
Black cab driver Bernie Doyle, 68, said: "If Paris, Milan and Berlin don't accept it why should we? I've been driving 42 years and I'm not about to see my trade go down the pan."
Stewart Rose, who has been been driving since 1971, said: "It's the beginning of the end for us. If Uber can do it what's going to stop other companies from getting this app?
Taxi strike Taxis started to move away from 15:00 BST
"Why did they award them the licence before it went to court, they've done it the wrong way round."
Organisations including the Rail and Maritime Transport union, London Cab Drivers Club and Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) were represented at the protest.
Some in Trafalgar Square were heard chanting "Boris, Boris, Boris, out, out, out", while others beeped horns and held placards.
Uber launched in 2009 and operates in more than 70 cities across 37 countries.
Taxi protest in Berlin Similar protests took place across Europe, including this one in Berlin
While those opposed to it are concerned unlicensed drivers are being contacted via the app, with no checks on whether they are legitimate, Uber said "every driver meets all local regulations" and is vetted with insurance and background checks.
TfL is seeking a High Court ruling on whether the use of such an app is legal.
The protests in London follow similar demonstrations in Paris, Madrid, Rome, Milan and Berlin.

Uber banned in Germany by Frankfurt court

Uber banned in Germany by Frankfurt court

Uber

Related Stories

Car pick-up service Uber has been banned across Germany.
A court in Frankfurt ruled that the firm lacked the necessary legal permits to operate under German law.
It has emerged that the firm was told last week that its "low-cost" UberPop service could no longer take passengers and faced a fine if it continued.
But an Uber spokesman said it had decided not to suspend the service, adding that the ban was not enforceable while an appeal process was ongoing.
"Germany is one of the fastest growing markets for Uber in Europe," he said.
"We will continue to operate in Germany and will appeal the recent lawsuit filed by Taxi Deutschland in Frankfurt.
"You cannot put the brakes on progress. Uber will continue its operations and will offer UberPop ridesharing services via its app throughout Germany."
A check of the firm's software confirms that drivers continue to offer UberPop pick-ups in Munich, Berlin, Hamburg, Frankfurt and Dusseldorf.
UberPop UberPop vehicles include the Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4 and BMW 3ER
UberPop was launched earlier this year and involves drivers - who are not directly employed by the company - over the age of 21 using their own cars to transport passengers.
Taxi Deutschland suggested that Uber could face up to a 250,000 euro ($327,840; £198,342) fine per trip if the American firm loses the case.
The body described its rival as a "form of locust share-economy" indulging in "anarchy capitalism" that could leave passengers exposed in the case of an accident.
"In Germany there's insurance that applies to private drivers," explained spokeswoman Anja Floetenmeyer.
"But if your insurer learns that you are driving for an app and you want to make money on that, they say this is a multiple risk and refuse to [pay] insurance on that.
"Uber doesn't care because security costs money. We don't believe it has the interests of [German] drivers and citizens at heart."
But Uber's spokesman in Germany, Fabien Nestmann, has previously blogged that safety is one of his firm's key concerns, adding that "all the rides - and thus all travellers - are insured by Uber".
European protests The summary judgment follows a decision by London's transport authorities not to pursue a case against Uber in June this year.
The San Francisco-based firm allows passengers to summon cars using an app on their smartphones and calculates the fare en route. It is often significantly cheaper than rival taxi companies.
Berlin protest Taxi driver in Berlin held a protest against ride-sharing apps in June
But taxi drivers argue that Uber has fewer regulatory burdens placed upon it than they do, and poses unfair competition.
The company - which is backed by Google and the bank Goldman Sachs, among others - has been the subject of protests by taxi drivers in many European cities, including Berlin, Paris and London.
Only last week, Uber said it was planning to rapidly expand its German operation.